Easy – if sloppy - thinking denigrates a nation’s achievements. “We’re the sick man of Europe… It will never be the same again…. We’re a third-rate nation now…” You know the kind of thing. There’s always some old bore at the end of the bar mumbling about it.

Yet this week we have really started to show our colours on the world’s stage. Everyone seems to agree that the G7 meeting in Cornwall was a great success- from a social, diplomatic and even Cornish standpoint. The PM and Carrie had real status amongst the world’s leaders, and we should be proud of them. That President Biden took time to stop off at Windsor Castle to celebrate the Queen’s 95th birthday is a mark of great respect (although why he thought it diplomatic to liken HM to his Mother is anyone’s guess.) We took our place at the NATO Summit proud of being the second largest member after the US, and the only Nation in the world who until now has paid 2% of GDP on defence and 0.7% on overseas aid. (At 0.5% we are still the fourth largest donor in the world.)

Despite the sad necessity of extending Lockdown until 19 July, we can still be proud of leading the world in our vaccine programme (which would simply not have happened had we still been a member of the EU); only as a result of beginning to beat the disease here can we now look to providing the world with this British-invented and (largely) manufactured vaccine. And I was so glad to see our world-beating Oxford scientists being recognised in the Queen’s Birthday Honours List.

Meanwhile we should celebrate the fact that the Free Trade Agreement with Australia is the seventieth we have so far agreed (and the first negotiated from scratch) post-Brexit, the total value of the trade being about £1.4 Trillion. We are once again becoming a great trading nation in our own right, and we should be proud of it. There’s a long way to go, of course, and many a wrinkle to be smoothed out, starting with Northern Irish sausages. How dare President Macron seek to describe Ulster as a separate country from the UK? It’s as much a part of the UK as Brittany (despite its name) is a part of France.

All of these events and more mean that we are able to stand proud alongside the greatest nations in the world. We are the masters of our own destiny. We control our own currency and economy; we make our own rules. We are freeing ourselves of the shackles of European bureaucracy, leaving behind the mediocrity, the lowest common denominator which the EU is forced to be.

We now have our moment in history - once again to be a true International Leader. So let’s cast aside the habitual British syndrome of ‘doing ourselves down’. No-one admires false modesty. Let’s salute these great early achievements; and thank and congratulate the ministers who are achieving them.

Britain must once again be Great.

Changes to Constituency boundaries always mean disquiet and discomfort. None of us likes change; and if the new proposals from the Parliamentary Boundary Commission published this week  eventually become law, then I will be very sad to lose places like Royal Wootton Bassett and Lyneham and Calne as well as a host of villages. I have represented their interests for 25 years and have so many friends across the patch. So it would be with a heavy heart that I would say ‘farewell’ to that part of my constituency. Under the proposals I would keep the northern half of it, including Malmesbury, Cricklade and Purton, to which would be added places like Tetbury, Cirencester, Fairford, Northleach and a great swathe of Gloucestershire countryside.

It’s only fair that all Parliamentary constituencies should be the same size - between 70 and 77,000 electors - but nonetheless achieving that every 10 years or so causes unwelcome disturbance in our democratic lives. It will all be much discussed over the next couple of years before final decisions are made, so watch this space….

I continue to hope that Britain will open up on 21 June, although the runes are looking a little sticky. It may be that the final Freedom Day will be delayed by a couple of weeks to allow vaccinations to catch up with infections; but I am hopeful that weddings in particular will be ‘full steam ahead’ from 21 June. We should hear on Monday, when the PM makes an announcement hot foot from Cornwall and the G7. (Have you noticed how much extra military air traffic there has been over Wiltshire for the last few days?)

The Indian Variant seems to be spreading like wildfire, especially amongst the young. I myself experienced it on Thursday. I was at the Oxford Union to speak in a debate about Veganism (against Heather McCartney- Mills!!) in support of livestock producers across Wiltshire as well as my own carnivorous instincts. But some student was given a positive Covid reading when she was actually in the audience and the whole event had to be scrapped. Another first-class speech went home in my pocket! All the speakers were kept clear of any possible infection; but it does go to show how much this variant is spreading among the young. The good news is that crucially there are relatively few hospitalisations and no deaths as a result. So let’s get young people vaccinated against it and we will finally be able to relax a little more.

In Parliament I chaired a debate on retail workers’ rights and the prevention of abuse and worse during the pandemic (hybrid- virtual and physical); and then I spoke in a debate about saving Burlington House, the ancient home of the Learned Societies (Physical). And on Friday I chaired a Ministerial meeting for Wiltshire exporters (entirely virtual). What experts we are all becoming on Zoom and Teams. And what lovely new phrases are entering our vocabulary (‘You’re on mute, Kevin.’)

In an action-packed week, I am delighted and proud that Philippa has been appointed to be a Governor both of Sir William Romney’s School in Tetbury and of Wiltshire College (with special responsibility for Lackham College of Agriculture and land-based skills.)

So, life moves on - Boundary Changes, Covid developments, new appointments.

Whatever next?

The pared-down version of the State Opening of Parliament was a shame in a way. No-one loves the Guards bands, the Household Cavalry, Her Majesty in her magnificent state coach, more than me. We had to make do with a few people in funny uniforms, and a handful of members of the Lords and Commons.

Yet in a way the much-reduced pomp and circumstance may counter-intuitively actually reinforce the constitutional importance of the event. The ceremony of Prorogation marked the end of the first session of Parliament after the General Election, and this was the starting gun for the second. The Head of State comes to Parliament to let us know what Her Government will be doing in the year which lies ahead. She announces proposed legislation to members of both Houses, but financial matters only to we Commoners. (We don’t let their Lordships get anywhere near the dosh side of things.) The Gracious Speech, of course, is written not by her, but by civil servants (which the pedestrian language may hint at); and I always admire the way the Queen manages to read it out without even the slightest smirk at some of the announcements she has to make. We then take away the list of Bills, spend 5 days debating it and then vote on it next Tuesday. Our approval of the speech gives the Government the green light to bring forward the Bills, which after due process go back to HM for her final approval.

There is some very good stuff in this year’s speech. Some of it (Environment Bill, Police and Law and Order Bill) is carried over from the previous session. Much of it is new and welcome. We simply have to do something about these dreadful prosecutions of our soldiers who carried out their orders in Northern Ireland 50 years ago. I will be watching that very carefully. Some parts of the three animal welfare bills are to be applauded, although they will need careful scrutiny to avoid unintended consequences. After all we in the UK already have some of the highest animal welfare standards in the world.

I am instinctively unhappy, however, with two proposed bills. The Planning Bill risks taking the right to decide on development away from local people in favour of pre-set goals and targets. If not handled well, that not only has a negative effect on local democracy (Neighbourhood Planning, for example, becomes redundant); it also risks allowing large amounts of development across our green and pleasant England in a way which I for one wholly decry. So I will be seeking to scrutinise/amend the planning bill, as will a good bunch of my Conservative MP colleagues. That alone may make the Government have to think again on some of its elements.

I am also uneasy about compulsory ID cards for voting. I am not aware of much voter fraud; and it would have to be in very large numbers to influence the outcome of any particular election. The good old way that we have always done it seems to me to work very well. Everyone has a right to vote whether or not they happen to have some kind of ID with them at the time; and I would not want to lose that age-old right. This sounds a bit like an unworkable and bossy solution to a problem which does not in reality exist

So as always there will be elements of the 30 or so major Bills we are bringing in over this Session with which I will not agree. And the great strength of being a backbencher is that I can do so - and if necessary, vote against the Government on some of them, without let or hindrance. I have always prided myself on my independence of mind, and commitment to doing what is right for the people of North Wiltshire whether or not that happens to coincide what the Government may be planning. That mildly buccaneering freedom of thought and of action will - as ever - be my lodestar.

There are, of course, very powerful arguments in favour of maximising the amount of money which we donate to deserving causes of all kinds around the world. We are vastly rich by comparison with most places; a billion of us in the prosperous North  go to bed obese while another billion elsewhere go to bed starving; we have inherited moral obligations not least from our Imperial past; and there are strong strategic reasons for supporting free liberal democracies round the world to prevent the levers of power falling into dangerous hands. A nuclear-armed Pakistan, for example, would look very different if we did not support them through our aid budgets.  For all of those reasons, I have always supported the principle of generous overseas aid.

However, I originally opposed the introduction of a legally binding 0.7% of GDP for a variety of reasons. What if we don’t have enough good projects one year to get the spending up to that level? Do we ladle the cash out willy-nilly to avoid breaking the law? Some years we might morally want to spend more than 0.7%, but no Treasury would ever allow it.  Because of the way it is calculated, a recession would mean an unfortunate reduction in the actual amount spent; and an economic boom might well mean money being wasted. We ought to be very careful about how we spend it- a great deal in the past has fallen into the wrong hands and supported dictators or corrupt governments.

And anyhow, what is the purpose of any such law? What possible sanction do we apply if the Government fails to achieve 0.7% of GDP one year? Does the PM go to prison? These should be matters for political decision- for ministers to decide and then to justify that decision alongside all of the other spending decisions they have to make.

Is 0.7% (roughly £14 Billion) for overseas aid more or less important than the £15 Billion for post Covid education demanded by Sir Kevan Collins? Is it more or less important than defending our Realm from overseas aggression (a Russian sub was spotted in the Irish Sea this week). Is it more or less important than extra spending on the NHS, maintaining the furlough scheme until we are safely out of the Pandemic, or a host of other priorities? These are the balanced decisions which ministers must make (and no matter how much they spend on anything it will be ‘not enough’) Juggling the post-Pandemic economy and government borrowing is a tricky job for Rishi Sunak at the best of times; doing so with one arm tied behind his back by a law which requires him to spend £14 Billion a year rather than the £10 Billion he is proposing on helping overseas aid projects makes his job impossible.

So despite my support for the moral and ethical and historical imperative of overseas aid, I will be voting with the Government against a rebel vote next week on the subject. And by doing so I will be helping the Government in their brave efforts to do what must be done to get us through this Pandemic and restore our previous prosperity. (7% growth predicted this week by that very careful organisation the OECD.) That is when we should once again turn our attention to using our wealth to help those less fortunate than ourselves around the world. I do not subscribe to the old cliché about “charity beginning at home”. We owe our charitable benevolence to poorer people across the world.

But just not yet.

I once went round the terrifying assault course at the Guards Depot at Pirbright. (Thankfully no record exists as to how I fared at it!) One particularly nasty obstacle was a line of semi-submerged stepping stones across a filthy dirty and freezing cold swimming pool, carefully spaced so that unless you hit the first stone at full tilt, and sprinted over, you’d land up in the drink.

Political life is a bit like that – hit the first stepping-stone at full speed and keep up the momentum all the way across. Boris won the Brexit referendum; toppled Theresa May; won the subsequent leadership battle; won the General Election with the first decent majority in 25 years; is close to defeating Covid without apparently wrecking the economy; has weathered a few storms in his personal life; and now seems to have done better in these mid-term elections than any Prime Minister in living memory. Phew!

The by-election victory in Hartlepool is of course spectacular. More than 50% of the vote; a 16% swing in our favour; the Tories securing almost double the Labour vote. No matter which way you look at it it’s a shattering blow for the Labour Party and Keir Starmer, the reverberations of which will be with us for a very long time. Hartlepool has been reflected in similar results in the local government elections across the Labour heartlands and elsewhere.

We will hear more over the weekend but if these early signs are anything to go by, it’s been a spectacularly good election for the Tories, a disaster for Labour, with the minority parties- greens, LibDems and so on barely featuring. I remain concerned about Scotland where an SNP majority (which is possible) might well lead to another Referendum, although I am beginning to think that only then will my fellow Scots come to realise what a catastrophic economic collapse there would be in an independent Scotland. Perhaps only when they are teetering on the edge of the cliff will they pull back from it.

I am confident that here in Wiltshire we will see very little change. We should now thank those who have served and are standing down, congratulate those newly elected and thank everyone who stood unsuccessfully (for the part they played in maintaining a decent democracy).

When the dust settles; Brexit behind us, lockdown is a dim memory, the economy bouncing back; that’s when Tory hegemony in local and national government must allow a decent period of peace and quiet. We need to settle down, get on with the less spectacular but vastly more important business of running Britain and doing what we can to help with peoples’ everyday lives. People of all sorts, of all political persuasions and none; and for the first time in 50 or 100 years, people from every corner of the country.

These elections and the history of the last 5 years or so has given we Tories a great opportunity. Parliament and Government must return to normal after 21 June, and then get on with the day-job. We’re teetering on the last of the submerged stepping-stones; and one last leap will get us back to dry land.